VanguardLH wrote:
> As you can plainly see, Burnelli is highly rude and extremely arrogant.
Hi VanguardLH,
You are the one giving BAD ADVICE which is dead wrong, which is what I care
about, not your feelings or my feelings. I don't want you (or Steve) giving
wrong advice to everyone when the REASON you're wrong is you don't read.
> Yes, there might be a non-root method, but I didn't find when searching.
Wrong. Dead wrong. I can't tell you how many times we discussed this.
You first filter out all facts and then you claim you can't find them.
> Also, because of Burnelli holier-than-thou attitude, I filter him out,
> so normally I won't see his solutions.
Idiot. They are not "my solutions" you imbecile.
This isn't personal.
This is about you filtering out all facts (which is fine); but then you
constantly give your ignorant "advice" to poor hapless innocent victims.
It should be clear it's not YOU I care about.
It's them.
> He also posts using Bastard
> Operator From Hell (paganini.bofh).
WTF? What does the server have to do with anything?
Do you even know what happened to Paolo Amaroso?
If you do not know, then stop proving to be ignorant of facts everyone else
is extremely well aware of since it's been discussed for months on end.
< Anyone declaring themself an
> asshole, or conveying messages through someone declaring themself an
> asshole, gets filtered. We have an asshole posting through an asshole.
> No thanks.
You don't even make sense in _how_ you filter out all facts, Vanguard.
It's a server. Nothing more. Nothing less.
The "name" they give their server is somehow, meaningful to you, in ways
that only a racist could imagine, Vanguard.
Jesus Christ. What's next? You're going to attack me based on my mother's
maiden name? Or the name of my cat? Or my favorite food? What's next?
Remember, I know you extremely well. You're a racist throughout.
I know that. I've said that many times. Just like Mayayana is a racist.
By basing your entire belief system on a name that I have absolutely no
control over, you just proved me right about you being a die-hard racist.
Again.
> If this topic was covered so many times as Burnelli claims, *others*
> would've mentioned the ADB method, and I would've seen their replies. I
> don't reside over in the xda-developers forums. Maybe Burnelli does. I
> certainly don't recall all those "many times" discussions HERE.
Jesus Christ, Vanguard. Run a search for once before you spout bullshit.
Again, I don't care about you. I care about others.
Specifically, your advice is dead wrong because you filter out all facts.
> Interesting that Burnelli modifies his solution with the "catch". The
> xda forum thread Burnelli noted mentions something I thought would be a
> gotcha: removing the Google app means losing something (Google Voice
> typing). Hope those using the ADB method don't accidentally specify the
> wrong package name. There's no undo. Still, it's safer than rooting.
Idiot. You filtered out the fact that I opened an entire thread on that!
*For experts only - what exactly remains after you've deleted*
*Google apps using adb on the PC without being rooted on Android?*
<
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/CASmcVqVmCg>
All you care about is filtering out facts.
Meanwhile, all I care about is obtaining the facts.
We're two completely different beasts, Vanguard.
I know you mean well. I truly do. I don't think you're mean spirited.
I just think you're stupid.
And again, I don't care that you're stupid.
I care that you are filtering out facts to the point that you bestow your
stupidity onto others. That's the only thing I care about Vanguard.
Let me make it extremely clear that I am aware you filter out all facts.
And I don't care about that.
What I care about is, as a result of you (and Steve) filtering out all
facts, almost everything you tell others is almost always dead wrong.
That's what I care about.
Them. Not you.
I don't want you giving dead wrong advice.
Especially since all your bad advice is a direct result of your filtering.
> Hmm, wonder what happens if you need to reset your phone. Wouldn't all
> those bundled apps you uninstalled before end up returning? So, keep
> notes on all the ADB commands you did.
If you truly "wonder" about that, then please post to the thread on that.
*For experts only - what exactly remains after you've deleted*
*Google apps using adb on the PC without being rooted on Android?*
<
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android/c/CASmcVqVmCg>
Usenet is water under the bridge to me, Vanguard. If you act like an adult
moving forward, I treat you like you are an adult, Vanguard.
I've always been that way.
Ask Carlos, for example.
I treat you like you need to be treated.
Act like an adult and I'll treat you like one.
I'm a mirror of YOU when I respond to you.
Accept that and act like an adult in your next post & watch how I respect
you; but if you provide wrong advice again, that we've covered so many
times that I can't count how many times, then I'll call you out on it.
Not because I care about you. I don't.
I care about the innocent people you are giving the wrong advice to.
You are so detailed you have much more to offer them than wrong advice.
> The OP never divulged just why he wants to remove some apps other than
> mentioning "clutter". Well, deleting shortcuts in screens (or within
> groups) and even hiding them in the Apps Folder suffices for removing
> clutter for unused apps that are normally non-uninstallable. The ADB
> scheme goes beyond just de-cluttering the OP's phone.
I understand you VanguardLH. I truly do. I know you're a racist, for
example, because you judge people by "guessing" _why_ they do things.
That's fine, but racists like you are almost always dead wrong, Vanguard.
Steve is also a racist. I know him even _better_ than I understand you.
Both of you _care greatly_ why they want to delete Google apps.
Me?
I don't care why.
They asked us a question of "how" to delete them.
I concentrated _all_ my responses on answering their question.
I didn't judge their motives like you (and Steve) constantly do.
BTW, it's not that I can't judge their motives, just like I know that both
you and Steve actually mean well, where Steve, unfortunately, is a
political animal so he's always easy to sniff out when he's shilling.
But you're NOT a political animal.
You are truly trying to help.
And I respect that in you.
You are detailed.
Very detailed.
The ONLY problem with you, Vanguard, is you filter out all the facts.
If you didn't filter out all the facts, you wouldn't be so dead wrong.
Again, it's not you I care about.
It's the people whom you give all your wrong advice to I care about.
Bear in mind Usenet is water under the bridge to me, so if you shape up and
actually read before you post, then you won't hear a peep about it from me.